Georgia People’s Interests Restoration Act

By
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

To enact Chapter 25 under Title 15 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, relating to state government, so as to provide for the restoration and preservation of the people’s interests above all others; to provide for legislative findings and purposes; to provide for limiting the scope and authority of Georgia courts and courts under the jurisdiction of Georgia to those authorized as prescribed under the Constitution of the State of Georgia;  to provide for limiting the scope and authority of United States courts and courts under the jurisdiction of the United States to those authorized as prescribed under the Constitution of the United States; to provide for definitions; to provide for a short title; to provide for an effective date; to repeal conflicting laws; and for other purposes.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF GEORGIA:

SECTION 1.

This Act shall be known and may be cited as the "Georgia People’s Interests Restoration Act."

SECTION 2.

Title 15 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, relating to state government, is amended by adding a chapter to read as follows:

“CHAPTER 25

15-25-1.

(a)    The General Assembly finds and determines that:

(1)    Article II, Paragraph 1 of the Constitution of the State of Georgia recognizes and prescribes, “All government, of right, originates with the people, is founded upon their will only, and is instituted solely for the good of the whole.”

(2)    The Constitution of the State of Georgia neither recognizes nor prescribes any powers for government to assert or recognize interests apart from those of the people.

(3)    The Constitution of the State of Georgia neither recognizes nor prescribes interests reserved in, of or for State of Georgia itself.

(4)    The Constitution of the State of Georgia neither recognizes nor prescribes interests which may be termed, “compelling government interests.”

(5)    Neither shall state courts, nor courts of lesser jurisdiction under the court system of Georgia assert, cite, determine into existence or consider as valid interests other than those of the people, from which all rights to govern originate.

(6)    Neither shall state courts, nor courts of lesser jurisdiction under the court system of Georgia assert, cite, determine into existence or consider as valid any interests such as those which may be described as, “compelling government interests.”

(7)    Neither shall any party or officer within the Executive Branch of State Government cite, determine into existence or consider as valid interests other than those of the people, from which all rights to govern originate.

(8)    Neither shall any party or officer within the Executive Branch of State Government assert, cite, determine into existence or consider as valid any interests such as those which may be described as, “compelling government interests.”

(9)    Any assertion, determination into existence or consideration as valid regarding proposed interests other than those of the people of the State of Georgia, by any state office holder, state employee, agent of the state, state court appointed official or official of any lower courts under the state courts, which would proposed sovereign interests of any Georgia government, county government, municipal or local government constituted under the laws of Georgia, or any interest referred as, “compelling government interests,” shall be null, void, to no effect, and unauthoritative on its face, within the State of Georgia.

50-25-2

The General Assembly finds and determines that:

(1)    The State of Georgia is one of numerous signatories jointly and severally authorizing the United States Constitution.

(2)    Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution enumerates the sole powers authorized to the United States Congress.

(3)    There are no powers authorized to the United States Congress beyond those enumerated in Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution.

(4)    There are no interests conveyed to the United States Congress within the terms of the United States Constitution.

(5)    The Executive and Judicial Branches of the United States, described in Article II and Article III, respectively, of the United States Constitution, are subject to, restricted to and restrained by the laws of the US Congress and the duties described within those articles.

(6)    The United States Constitution conveys no powers to the United States Congress, the President of the United States, or the United States Supreme Court, or such offices, departments, sub-offices or sub-departments under those branches beyond those enumerated or directly implied necessary to carry out the purposes described within the enumerated powers.

(7)    All interests regarding the US Constitution reside in what that document refers as, “We the people of the United States.”

(8)    The United States Constitution conveys no interests to the United States or any offices, departments, sub-offices or sub-departments under its authorities.

(9)    In particular, the United States Constitution conveys no interests to the United States known as, “compelling government interests.”

(10)    Any and all judicial opinion offered under the authorities conveyed to the United States within the terms of the United States Constitution, and which would validate findings under a doctrine which asserts interests beyond those of, “We the people of the United States,” including but not limited to alleged interests of the United States, or those alleged and described as, “compelling government interests” or any other term or terms which place the United States into a position of owning interests separate and apart from those of, “We the people of the United States,” shall be forever null, void, to no effect, unauthoritative on its face, within the State of Georgia.

50-25-3

As used in this chapter, the term:

(1)    ‘Interest’ shall mean (a)standing in a court case;  (b) right, title, or legal share in the outcome of a court case; (c) right of participation in the determination of the outcome of a court case;  (d) advantage sought through the outcome of a court case; (e) responsibility to advocate or promote a chosen outcome in a court case.

(2)     ‘United States’ shall mean that governing body comprised of three branches described in the United States Constitution.

(3)    ‘United States Constitution’ shall mean, ‘Constitution of the United States.’

(4)    ‘Georgia Constitution’ shall mean, ‘Constitution of Georgia.’

(5)    ‘Georgia’ shall mean, ‘State of Georgia.’

(6)    ‘Enumerated powers’ shall mean those powers listed as conveyed to the Legislative Branch of the United States in Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution.

SECTION 3.

This Act shall become effective upon its approval by the Governor or upon its becoming law without such approval.

SECTION 4.

All laws and parts of laws in conflict with this Act are repealed.

Comments

Post a Comment

Recent Articles

Storm is at the Door

By
Image
In last week’s article entitled, “It’s Payback Time,” I recalled growing up in “Camelot” prior to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.  Afterward, even from my 8-year-old perspective, the world changed, for the worse.  People I knew changed for the worse.  The trajectory of world events changed for the worse.  As America mourned, the outlook for peace in the world retreated, practically abandoned. As his fate approached, JFK decided to pull US advisors out of Vietnam, sent there by Eisenhower.  Doing so would have prevented an eventual military involvement that would leave 58,000 Americans dead, their names carved in consolation on a wall in DC, countless US casualties, American families irrevocably broken, not to mention millions of enemy victims. Five months prior to his assassination, JFK ordered the US Treasury Department to begin abandoning the policy of borrowing Federal Reserve currency to pay the bills of the US government. On June 4th 1963, Kennedy exercise
Read more

War and Peace- Handicap Georgia's 6th District Congressional Race-Part 2

By
Image
Two weeks ago, I published my best effort at an objective handicap of the 6th District Congressional race .  It was important for me to be objective because leading up to the time of writing that article, I had not made up my mind whom I would support.  What you read in that article was an analysis of the information I had available on those I considered the top three candidates, analysis which I performed in determining who I, myself, would support.  I had no favorite going into the week-long effort it took me to research and write that analysis.  Should you to look back at my social media, you will not find any post, prior to releasing that paper, supporting one candidate or another in the 6th District race.  Jake Evans                                   Rich McCormick                           Mallory Staples And if you read that paper, then you already know that according to my appraisal there are three viable candidates in the 6th District, Rich McCormick, Jake Evans and Mallory St
Read more

It’s Payback Time

By
Image
When did you first become aware of the larger world beyond your home, immediate family, your friends, your school, maybe trips to the grocery store with mom?  For me, it was during the days many referred as, “Camelot.” Now I vaguely remember the election of 1960.  My dad voted for Nixon, mom for Kennedy.  I remember them saying they cancelled each other’s vote.  That would not happen today, not without hair pulling, a divorce or worse, but I digress.  So, I remember Camelot in America, the presidency of John F. Kennedy, who together with First Lady Jackie, children Caroline and John Jr., or “John John,” presented an image of style and grace, humor and humility, the ideal American family, at least it appeared. At our school I remember JFK’s picture hanging next to the American flag.  Each day before instruction, we would stand, place our hands over our hearts and recite the Pledge, followed by the Lord’s Prayer.  Then we would sing patriotic songs conveying a sense of what America was,
Read more